IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 CR-777-2024 Date of decision: 07.04.2025 ARJAN SINGH ..Petitioner Versus TAJINDER SINGH BAJWA @ HARJINDER SINGH ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sirphikhi, Advocate for respondent. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral) 1. The First Appellate Court has granted conditional stay to the appellant (defendant) subject to furnishing of security bond of Rs.3,00,000/-. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner claims that the conditional order could not be passed by the First Appellate Court because there is no prayer for grant of mesne profits for use and occupation of the premises. 3. The Appellate Court while granting injunction against implementation of the decree is entitled to lay down reasonable conditions in order to ensure that there is no difficulty in implementation of the decree. 4. Moreover, the Court is entitled to mould the relief. 5. Hence, no ground to interfere is made out. 6. Dismissed. April 07th, 2025 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.04.09 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.