Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24384 WP No. 8386 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8386 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN:
SMT. RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O VENKATARAMEGOWDA, BETTADAHALLI VILLAGE, SHRAVANABELAGOLA HOBLI, CHENNARAYAPATTANA TALUK, HASSAN-573 116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR.B.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, LT RATING, CESC, SHRAVANABELAGOLA, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 116.
2.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (EL), O AND M SUB-DIVISION (CESC), CHANNARAYAPATNA SUB-DIVISION, CESC, NAVODHAYA CIRCLE, C.R.PATNA, HASSAN-573 116.
3.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (EL), CESC DIVISION, LT RATING, CHANNARAYAPATNA-573 116.
4.
THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER (EL), O AND M CIRCLE, O AND M ZONE, CESC, CESC ZONAL OFFICE
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24384 WP No. 8386 of 2025
AT HASSAN, SANTHEPETE, B.M.ROAD, HASSAN-573 201.
5.
CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED (CESC), REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, CESC MYSORE, CORPORATE OFFICE, NO.29, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, HINKAL, MYSURU-570 017. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. M.C.AMRUTHA VARSHINI., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Mohan Kumar.B.M., counsel for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing. Smt.M.C.Amrutha Varshini., counsel for the respondents has appeared in person.
2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.03.2025 vide Annexure-J.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24384 WP No. 8386 of 2025
3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several
contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has made a representation on 04.03.2025 and the same has not been considered as of today. Counsel for the respondents submits that a detailed statement of objections is filed stating that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered and the same is forwarded to the petitioner. Hence, nothing survives for
consideration in the present Writ Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the respondents is placed on record. A perusal of the statement of objections and the documents furnished by the respondents reveals that the representation of the petitioner has already been considered by the respondents and the grievance of the petitioner is met with, hence, nothing survives for consideration in the present Writ Petition.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24384 WP No. 8386 of 2025
5. Resultantly the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19