(1) 62-wp-9437-2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9437 OF 2019 GAUTAM DHONDUJI BHISE VERSUS THE LEARNED MINISTER VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 543 OF 2019 MEENABAI RAMCHANDRA BAVNE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Subhash K. Savangikar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. S. K. Chavan, Advocate for Respondent No.5. Mr. P. V. Tapse, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 11th JULY, 2025. P.C.:- 1. Mr. Chavan, learned Advocate appearing for respondent points out that grievance raised in petitions is no more survives due to efflux of time. 2. In that view of the matter, Writ Petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/July-2025 2025:BHC-AUG:18222