[2025:RJ-JP:23640] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7052/2025 Mukesh S/o Sindhi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Aligarh, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL ( V.J.) Order 26/06/2025 1. Instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with a criminal case bearing No.250/2025 for offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted bail and he had gone out, for earning his livelihood, therefore he failed to be present in the Court and his bail bonds were forfeited. Counsel for petitioner undertakes to deposit the penalty as determined by the trial Court in proceedings under Section 491 of B.N.S.S. and that the petitioner shall regularly attend the Court on all dates in future, if he is enlarged on bail, therefore, petitioner be given benefit of bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Heard counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:23640] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7052/2025] 5. Having considered the contention of counsel for petitioner and specially the undertaking of the petitioner, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail, subject to condition. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mukesh S/o Sindhi shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, before enlarging the petitioner on bail, the trial Court shall ensure to conclude proceedings of 491 of B.N.S.S. and to deposit the penalty by the petitioner as determined by the trial Court. If petitioner again jumps the bail and violate the undertaking, the same shall be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail, granted by this Court. (SUDESH BANSAL ( V.J.)),J RONAK JAIMAN/175