MUKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ORS v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR REGIONALORS
CW/2022/2014 · 2025-02-06
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20462 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20462 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5208] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2022/2014
1. Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Bhura Ram Saini, R/o Aamliyo, Ringas Raod, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 2. Ram Kishore Saini S/o Shri Jagnaath Saini, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 3. Puranmal Kuldeep S/o Shri Ganesh Narain Kuldeep, R/o Ward No. 26, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 4. Hajarilal Butoliya S/o Shri Raghunath Butoliya, R/o Ward No. 26, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Appellants/Petitioners Versus
1. The Deputy Director (Regional), Local Body, Jaipur ----Proforma-Respondent
2. Anandi Lal S/o Shri Gopi Chand, R/o Aamaliyo Ward No.26, near Raghunathdasji Bagechi, Ringus Road, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. Applicant-Respondent
3. The Municipal Board, Chomu through its Chairman/Executive Officer, Office of the Municipal Board, Chomu District Jaipur. Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2019/2014
1. Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Bhura Ram Saini, R/o Aamliyo, Ringas Raod, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 2. Ram Kishore Saini S/o Shri Jagnaath Saini, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 3. Puranmal Kuldeep S/o Shri Ganesh Narain Kuldeep, R/o Ward No. 26, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 4. Hajarilal Butoliya S/o Shri Raghunath Butoliya, R/o Ward No. 26, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Appellants/Petitioners Versus
1. The Deputy Director (Regional), Local Body, Jaipur ----Proforma-Respondent
[2025:RJ-JP:5208] (2 of 3) [CW-2022/2014]
2. Ramlal Mali S/o Shri Manna Lal Mali, R/o Aamaliyo Ward No.26, near Raghunathdasji Bagechi, Ringus Road, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. Applicant-Respondent
3. The Municipal Board, Chomu through its Chairman/Executive Officer, Office of the Municipal Board, Chomu District Jaipur. Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2020/2014
1. Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Bhura Ram Saini, R/o Aamliyo, Ringas Raod, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 2. Ram Kishore Saini S/o Shri Jagnaath Saini, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 3. Puranmal Kuldeep S/o Shri Ganesh Narain Kuldeep, R/o Ward No. 26, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 4. Hajarilal Butoliya S/o Shri Raghunath Butoliya, R/o Ward No. 26, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Appellants/Petitioners Versus
1. The Deputy Director (Regional), Local Body, Jaipur ----Proforma-Respondent
2. Prem Devi W/o Shri Ramlal Mali, R/o Aamaliyo Ward No.26, near Raghunathdasji Bagechi, Ringus Road, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. Applicant-Respondent
3. The Municipal Board, Chomu through its Chairman/Executive Officer, Office of the Municipal Board, Chomu District Jaipur. Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2021/2014
1. Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Bhura Ram Saini, R/o Aamliyo, Ringas Raod, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 2.
Ram Kishore Saini S/o Shri Jagnaath Saini, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 3. Puranmal Kuldeep S/o Shri Ganesh Narain Kuldeep, R/o Ward No. 26, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. 4. Hajarilal Butoliya S/o Shri Raghunath Butoliya, R/o Ward No. 26, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. [2025:RJ-JP:5208] (3 of 3) [CW-2022/2014] ----Appellants/Petitioners Versus
1. The Deputy Director (Regional), Local Body, Jaipur ----Proforma-Respondent
2. Bhanwar Lal Kumawat S/o Shri Dhanna Lal Kumawat, R/o Aamaliyo Ward No.26, near Raghunathdasji Bagechi, Ringus Road, Town Chomu, District Jaipur. Applicant-Respondent
3. The Municipal Board, Chomu through its Chairman/Executive Officer, Office of the Municipal Board, Chomu District Jaipur. Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saransh Saini Mr. Vinod Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order 06/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under the law for redressal of their grievance(s).
Learned counsel for the respondents does not oppose the prayer. In view thereof, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J MAHIMA/13-16