MOHIT YAGIK S/O LATE KAILASHNATH YAGIK v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7066/2025 · 2025-06-12
Anand Sharma V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20459 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20459 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23140] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7066/2025 Mohit Yagik S/o Late Kailashnath Yagik, R/o House No. 104/389, P Road, Seesa Mau, Police Station Bajriya Kanpur, District Kanpur (U.p.), Present Tenant House No. 106, Mangal Nagar, Sirsi Road, Police Station Karnivihar, Jaipur (Raj.). (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.P. Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Nitesh Pareek Mr. Dalbir Singh, CI-PS-Shyam Nagar, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 12/06/2025
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No. 199/2025 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 308(2), 319(2) and 61(2)(b) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this matter. Learned counsel further submits that in the entire complaint/FIR neither petitioner has been named nor there is any allegation against him. Accused-petitioner has also not received any amount pursuant to the alleged transaction. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. Counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner is behind the bar since long.
[2025:RJ-JP:23140] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7066/2025] Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Therefore, the accused-petitioner may be allowed to enlarge on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed this bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made at Bar.
5. Taking into consideration, the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the fact that petitioner has not received any amount of the alleged transaction, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Mohit Yagik S/o Late Kailashnath Yagik, shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.199/2025 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar District Jaipur City (South) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused- petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court.
7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise.
(ANAND SHARMA (V.J.)),J ashu /159