1 2025:CGHC:21131-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1570 of 2025 Amiya Tiwari S/o Rajendra Kumar Tiwari Aged About 45 Years R/o Mahamai Ward Mungeli Police Station And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ashish Tiwari S/o Ashok Tiwari Aged About 39 Years R/o Mahamai Ward Mungeli Police Station And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Rooprani Tiwari W/o Ashok Tiwari Aged About 66 Years R/o Mahamai Ward, Mungeli Police Station And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State For Respondents No.2 and 3 : : Mr.Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer Mr.Rarunendra Mishra and Mr.Vibhash Chandra Tiwari, Advocates Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.05.09 11:02:04 +0530 2 8.5.2025 1. Heard Mr.Bhaskar Payashi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1/State and Mr.Varunendra Mishra and Mr.Vibhash Chandra Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief: “(i) first information report bearing Crime No.5/2020 registered on 03/01/2020 in Police Station Mungeli, (ii) Consequent charge-sheet No.299/2020 filed on 24/08/2020 filed before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mungeli and (iii) Charge framed for the offence punishable under Section 509(B) of the Indian Penal Code in Criminal Case No.352/2020, pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mungeli, District Mungeli, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file proper agreement executed between the parties with respect to compromise, if any as it is stated that an oral settlement has been done between the parties. 3 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- / Sd/- Sd/- /(Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu