CHINNA KULLAI REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/14762/2023 · 2025-09-03
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20452 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20452 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010286602023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 14762/2023 Between:
1. CHINNA KULLAI REDDY, S/O. KULLAI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. JANGAMREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, NARAPALA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRI. 2. K. VARALAKSHMI, W/O. KULLAI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. JANGAMREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, NARAPALA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRAEDESH STATE. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NARPALA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5. K NARESH, S/O. PEDDANNA, R/O. THUMPERA H/O.
GUGUDU VILLAGE, NARPALA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in cancelling the assignment vide Proceedings D.Dis.No.D2(B)/3715/2022, dated. 05.06.2023 of the petition without hearing the petitioners, without conducting proper enquiry is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and to pass
2 IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Proceedings D.Dis.No.D2(B)/3715/2022, dated. 05.06.2023 of the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 14762 of 2023 ORDER:
Sri A.Aravind Reddy, learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition and also endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 04.09.2025 SPP
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
W.P.No. 14762 OF 2023
Date: 04.09.2025
SPP