Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:20872
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3225 of 2025 1 - Ram Singh Patel S/o Shri Narmada Prasad Patel Aged About 51 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 2 - Vidya Bhushan Rathore S/o Shri Ram Pyare Rathore Aged About 51 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jajang, District- Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Etwar Singh Kanwar S/o Shri Hans Ram Kanwar Aged About 49 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Anil Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Ram Dev Dewangan Aged About 46 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 5 - Gajendra Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Data Ram Rathore Aged About 44 SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.05.08 16:56:05 +0530
2 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 6 - Vijay Kumar Khunte S/o Shri Paltan Das Khunte Aged About 52 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. High School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 7 - Geeta Rathore W/o Shri Pramod Kumar Rathore Aged About 45 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 8 - Gauri Shankar Bhaskar S/o Shri Tilak Ram Bhaskar Aged About 54 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 9 - Vijay Telee S/o Shri Pandeet Ram Telee Aged About 36 Years Working As P.T.I. And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 10 - Chandra Kumari Rathore W/o Shri Sudarshan Prasad Rathore Aged About 55 Years Working As Head Master (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 11 - Bhit Kumari Rathiya W/o Shri Jagmohan Rathiya Aged About 41 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.)
3 12 - Smt. Indira Singh W/o Banshi Lal Aged About 40 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Jajang Awas Para, District Sakti (C.G.) 13 - Kumari Eashwari Pradhan D/o Shri Bed Ram Pradhan Aged About 53 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt.
Middle School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.) 14 - Smt. Sarita Khunte W/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Khunte Aged About 43 Years Working As Head Master (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School
Jajang,
Block,
District
Sakti
(C.G.) 15 - Ku Archana Gabel D/o Parmeshwar Prasad Aged About 44 Years Working As Head Master (L.B.) Govt. Primary School Jajang, District Sakti (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
4 3 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchyat Sakti District Sakti (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Sakti District Sakti (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate. Respondent(s) : Shri Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri
Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order on Board 07.05.2025
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the respondent authorities for grant of Kramonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the
order dated 28.02.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 and also as per circular dated 10.03.2017 issued by the State Government of C.G.
2. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No. 261 of 2023, has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for
5 Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order dated 28/02/2024 passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023.
3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents.
5. Against the order passed in WA No. 261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Supreme Court bearing SLP (C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated
17.03.2025.
6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of
6 receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of the petitioners on its own merits.
7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib