Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2045 (ORI)

MUNA @ BISWARANJAN SWAIN v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/12707/2025 · 2026-04-16

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.12707 of 2025 Muna @ Biswaranjan Swain … Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bhanjadeo, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL):16.04.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Khurda Sadar PS Case No.194 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.632 of 2025 pending in the file of learned SDJM, Khurda, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.126(2)/118(1)/109/351(2)/3(5) of BNS r/w Sections 25/27 of Arms Act, on the main allegation of attempting to the life of the injured (son of the informant) by firing two rounds at him and assaulting him with sharp weapons, along with co-accused persons in furtherance of their common intention. 3. Heard, Mr. Sanjib Kumar Bhanjadeo, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. 4. After having considered the rival submissions taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the p. 2 allegation sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the materials placed on record together with the allegation against the petitioner for firing at the injured and assaulting him with sharp cutting weapon and the injury report of the injured Debasish Samantasinghar revealing about him to have sustained cut injury over his scalp and other injuries near his umbilicus and such injury as opined by the doctor could be due to gun shot and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety including the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands rejected. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the learned Court in seisin over the matter. (G. Satapathy) Judge Subhasmita Designation: Sr. Stenographer