Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20442 (JHR)

ARBIND BHUIYAN ALLIAS ARVIND BHUIYAN ALIAS MUKHIA JEE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/1190/2025 · 2025-09-26

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30484-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1190 of 2025 Arvind Bhuiyan @ Arbind Bhuiyan @ Mukhia Jee --- Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand. --- --- Respondent --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava --- For the Appellant : Mr. Vishnupad Singh, Adv. For the Respondent : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P 06/26.09.2025 This appeal has been preferred for grant of bail. Inadvertently vide order dated 22.09.2025 this appeal was admitted. Accordingly, that part of the order dated 22.09.2025 by which the appeal was admitted and trial court record was called for, is hereby recalled. Heard Mr. Vishnupad Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.04.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chatra in M.C.A. No. 669 of 2025 arising out of Rajpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2019, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. The allegation reveals that some improvised explosive devices were planted to cause harm to the police party. Subsequently, the same were defused. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been implicated on the confessional statement of a co-accused. It has been submitted that the appellant is in custody since 30.11.2023. Learned Spl.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has submitted that the appellant has got criminal antecedents. Regard being had to the manner of implication of the appellant, we while setting aside the order dated 21.04.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chatra in M.C.A. No. 669 of 2025 arising out of Rajpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2019, direct the appellant to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chatra in connection with M.C.A. No. 669 of 2025. This appeal stands allowed and disposed of. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands closed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Dated:26th September 2025 Shamim/