Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20442 (BOM)

SULTAN KHAN ILIYAS KHAN AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

WP/836/2025 · 2025-09-22

Shri Sachin S Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1-CrWP-836-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 836 OF 2025 SULTAN KHAN ILIYAS KHAN AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Ravi B. Gite APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. M. Ganachari Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Mohsin Khan ... CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 22-09-2025 PER COURT:- 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 has invited the attention of this Court with the order of Division Bench of this Court, in Family Court Appeal No.8 of 2025, dated 29.07.2025, that the direction for handing over custody of the child to the mother within a period of one week i.e from 23.06.2025 was issued. 3. When confronted with order of Division Bench, the learned counsel for the petitioners made a statement that custody of child will be handed over within three days to the respondent/mother. In order to comply with the same, the matter was deferred to 20.09.2025. 4. When the matter was called out on 20.09.2025, a request was made to defer the hearing of the petition. Accordingly, it was adjourned to 22.09.2025. 2025:BHC-AUG:27960 2 1-CrWP-836-25.odt 5. It is, thereafter, the learned counsel for the petitioner has informed today, the petitioner has collected the paper book and also sought NOC. The conduct of the petitioner is rather designed to defy the order of Division Bench of this Court, in Family Court Appeal No.8 of 2025, and also the undertaking to this Court. Resultantly, the criminal writ petition deserves to be dismissed by imposing cost of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousands Only). [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. ] rrd