Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 228 of 2025
Shahjad Khan
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Siddharth Bisht, A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.40 of 2024, under Section 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi)/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Shyampur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that based on one case, the applicant has been implicated in the case, but in the earlier case, the applicant has already been granted bail; the applicant is not a previous convict.
4.
These facts are admitted by learned State Counsel.
2
5.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6.
The bail application is allowed.
7.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
14.02.2025 Ravi Bisht