Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20439 (GAU)

PRASANTA SARMAH v. SMT. ANJALI BORTHAKUR AND 3 ORS.

CRP(IO)/344/2018 · 2025-09-25

Mitali Thakuria

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010231322018 2025:GAU-AS:13382 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/344/2018 PRASANTA SARMAH S/O- LT BINOD CH. SARMAH, R/O- CHARIGAON, BEBEJIA, DIST- JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS SMT. ANJALI BORTHAKUR AND 3 ORS. W/O- LT ANANTA BORTHAKUR, R/O- AMBARI SATGAON, GHY-781171 2:AMAR PHUKAN S/O- LT HAREKRISHNA PHUKAN R/O- BHEBALI DERGAON DIST- GOLAGHAT ASSAM- 785618 3:SMTI. ARADHANA PHUKAN W/O- LT ACHINTA PHUKAN R/O- EAST CHAMPARAN MOTIHARI BIHAR- 845401 4:SRI DIGBIJOY PHUKAN S/O- LT ACHINTA PHUKAN R/O- EAST CHAMPARAN MOTIHARI BIHAR- 84540 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BARUAH, MR. P G BHAGAWATI,MR. P K BORDOLOI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. JYOTIRMOY ROY (R1), MR. S BORTHAKUR (R1),MS. S KAKATI (R1) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard Mr. P. K. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the petitioner. No representation on behalf of the respondent on call. Further, it is submitted by Mr. Bordoloi, learned counsel that the matter has already been settled amicably outside the Court between the parties and in pursuant to the said settlement, an agreement was also executed between the petitioner and the respondent on 01.02.2021 at Jorhat and copy of the said agreement is also produced by the learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and in view of the settlement between the present petitioner and the respondent, this petition being infructuous stands disposed of. Copy of the said agreement dated 01.02.2021 executed between the petitioner and the respondent be kept as part of the record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant