Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 204355 (MAD)

J.AMUDHA v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/32642/2025 · 2025-12-01

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.OP.No.32642 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.12.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.OP.No.32642 of 2025 J.Amudha ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by, The Superintendent of Police, Salem, Salem District. 2. The State rep. by, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Salem Rural, Salem District. 3. The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Mallur Police Station, Salem District. ...Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to direct the respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 16.11.2025 and for other reliefs. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Pragadeesh Khumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, GA(Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.32642 of 2025 ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed seeking to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 16.11.2025. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that based on the complaint given by the petitioner, an enquiry was conducted and the petitioner was called for enquiry and during the course of enquiry, as it was found that the issue involved in the present case is purely civil in nature, the respondents have closed the enquiry, directing the petitioner and the counter party to approach the competent civil court and that the respondents are not harassing the petitioner. He also submitted that since there was a constant dispute between the petitioner and one Sanjay over possession of the property, based on the counter complaint lodged by the said Sanjay, the matter has been referred to the jurisdictional Revenue Divisional Officer for further enquiry. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.32642 of 2025 3. Recording the above submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this criminal original petition stands closed. 01.12.2025 skt Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No To: 1. The Superintendent of Police, Salem, Salem District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Salem Rural, Salem District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Mallur Police Station, Salem District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.32642 of 2025 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. skt Crl.OP.No.32642 of 2025 01.12.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis