Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20434 (JHR)

KAMLESH KUMAR VERMA ALIAS SONU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6891/2025 · 2025-08-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23035 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6891 of 2025 --------- Kamlesh Kumar Verma @ Sonu, aged about 27 years, S/o Late Awadhkishor Verma, R/o Village-Unta, PO-Chatra, PS-Sadar, Distt.- Chatra, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Bholanath Ojha, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-08.08.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 18, 22, 27 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.240 of 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that according to the FSL report only 900 gms of opium was recovered from the house of the petitioner during the course of search by the police when the petitioner was not present there. He further submits the quantity recovered comes under the purview of intermediary quantity. He lastly submits that the co- accused person namely Karan Kumar Verma who confessed the name of the petitioner has already been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No.10735 of 2023 and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 01.05.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the co- 2025:JHHC:23035 2 accused has already been granted bail; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Chatra in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.240 of 2023. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-