- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11956 WP No. 8064 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 8064 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. K R SUSHEELAMMA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS D/O G.SUNDRACHARI 2. P.CHANDRAMMA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS D/O G.SUNDRACHARI 3. G.DWARAKANATH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O G.SUNDRACHARI 4. P.S.BHARATHY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS D/O G.SUNDRACHARI 5. G.S.SRIHARI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O G.SUNDRACHARI 6. G.S.VASUDEVAN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O G.SUNDRACHARI 7. V.LAVANYA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS D/O G.S.VASUDEVAN 8. ROHINI VASUDEVAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS D/O G.S.VASUDEVAN Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11956 WP No. 8064 of 2025 ALL ARE R/AT BAGURU VILLAGE ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK-560067 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIGNESHWARA U., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR HOSKOTE TALUK HOSKOTE-560067 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.MANJUNATH., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TAHASILDAR TO MUTATE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE REVENUE RECORD (RTC) IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE LAND AND ISSUE FRESH RTC IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS FORTHWITH AS PER LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11956 WP No. 8064 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners have filed this Writ Petition seeking for a direction to the Thasildar to mutate their names in the revenue records in respect of the land in question. 2. The petitioners are seeking for their names to be entered on the basis of an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner in R.A.(O). No.8/2024 dated 06.05.2024. 3. Since the petitioners are claiming that their names are to be entered as per the order of the Assistant Commissioner, it would be appropriate to direct the Thasildar to consider the request of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47