Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20433 (CHH)

PUSHPANSHU PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3272/2025 · 2025-05-06

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20930 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3272 of 2025 1 - Pushpanshu Pandey S/o Shri Nand Kumar Pandey Aged About 24 Years Occupation- Student, R/o Ward No. 3, Near Shashti Temple, Civil Lines, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Collector Bemetara, District Bemetara (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer Bemetara, District Bemetara (C.G.) 4 - Joint Director Account Treasury And Pension Durg Division Durg, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) 5 - Principal Government Girls Higher Secondary School Bemetara, Distt.- Bemetara (C.G.) 6 - State Bank Of India Through Branch Manager, Sbi Branch Bemetara, Distt.- Bemetara (C.G.) Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.05.09 12:18:11 +0530 2 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, PL For Respondent/SBI : Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 07/05/2025 1. By the present petition, the petitioner whose mother was working as Assistant Teacher in the department of School Education, died on 04/12/2000 seeking a direction towards the respondent authority to release the pensionary benefit for the period when his sister who was receiving the pension attained the age of 25 years i.e. on 21/06/2024 till the age of the petitioner when the petitioner attained the age of 25 years. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the petitioner’s sister attained the age of 25 years, the petitioner is entitled for the pension and for which, the office of Department of Treasury vide communication dated 13/02/2025 asked the Principal, Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Bemetara to sanction the family pension in favour of the petitioner, but till date, no steps has been taken for payment of the said family pension to the petitioner till the period when the petitioner attained the age of 25 years. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that the Principal/respondent No.5 will take appropriate steps in accordance with communication dated 13/02/2025 issued by the Officer of Department of Treasury by verifying the entitlement of the petitioner within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the State/respondent, 3 the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal/respondent No.5 to take an appropriate steps regarding the entitlement of the family pension by the petitioner after when the petitioner’s sister attained the age of 25 years. The said exercise be done within a period of 60 days from the receipt of the order of this Court. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of . SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep