Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20431 (CHH)

SMT. GUNJA JAIN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3089/2025 · 2025-05-02

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20138 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3089 of 2025 1 - Smt. Gunja Jain W/o Shri Rajkishor Jain Aged About 38 Years Staff Nurse, Working At Community Health Center, Durgukondal, Kanker District- North Baster, Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Director, Health Services, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Singh, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 02/05/2025 2 1. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation before the concerned respondent authority, raising all grounds as he has raised in this writ petition, and on submission of such representation, concerned respondent authority may be directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with relevant law, rules/policies within the stipulated period which may be fixed by this Court. 2. The above prayer made by counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the State/Respondent. 3. On the basis of submissions, without going into merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a fresh representation raising all grounds as he raised in this writ petition before the concerned respondent authority within ‘three weeks’ from today and on submission of such representation, concerned respondent authority in turn is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with relevant law and rules/policies within an outer limit of ‘90 days’ from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep