BHARAT SINGH SON OF RADHEYSHYAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLAS/1438/2025 · 2025-05-30
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20430 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20430 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22825] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1438/2025 Bharat Singh Son Of Radheyshyam, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Wazirpura District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present In District Jail Tonk) ----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Ramraj Meena Son Of Badrilal Meena, Resident Of Chatarpura Police Station Uniyara District Tonk (Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 30/05/2025
1. This criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on behalf of the appellants being aggrieved with the order dated 20.05.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Tonk (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in FIR No. 228/2024 registered at Police Station-Uniyara, District-Tonk for the offence under Section 140(3) of BNS, 2023 whereby the trial court has dismissed the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material on record.
3. No one appears for the complainant despite service.
[2025:RJ-JP:22825] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-1438/2025]
4.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the name of the appellant has not been mentioned in the FIR and there is no active participation as per the prosecution story itself. Co-accused- Akash @ J.d. @ Jadeja has been released on bail by this Court on
09.04.2025. Appellant is behind the bars since 05.05.2024. Charge- sheet has been filed. All the offences except SC/ST Act are bailable. He further submits that investigation/trial of the case may take considerable time. Therefore, the appeal presented by the present appellant may be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer made on behalf of the appellant.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 14- A(2) of SC/ST Act.
7. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 20.05.2025 passed by the learned trial court is set aside. It is directed that appellant-Bharat Singh Son Of Radheyshyam shall be released on bail provided to executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/31