\`\ lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT.I TrfONOURABLE SRI JuST[CE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIIVIINAL PETI"®N NO: 5937 OF 2025 fz#Z I 3327] Between : cheekati praveen, s/o Ramamaiffih, Aged about 47 years, R/o Sri Krishnapuram Village, Srikalahasti Town and Mandal, Tirupati Dl-strict. ...petitioner/Accused No.3 I. I,.AEng'E! 1 The State Of Andhra Pradesh, F3ep.`cby its Public ProfeouTor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati g~~ , I.Respondent petition under section 438 -a-f'Cr.p.c is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidav:it+-fj!ed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner / A3 in the event of their arrest in conneet`ion with Crime No. 43 of 2025 dated 20.04.2025 under Sections 126(2)I,I 1L18(2) / 3(5) of BNS oELthe file of Thottambedu Police Station, Srjka]ahaSti, Chittoor District. -s _` \}. The petition coming on for hearjr!§, upon Perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and ripon hearing the arguments of SRI SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Ac!vocate for the Petitioner, Assistant Public prosecutor for the respondent and €hi±a c}-6urf made the following. ORDER APHCO10287062025 EFHHT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTy SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY £_RIMINAL PETITION NO: 5937/2025_ Between : Cheekati Praveen ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petitl-on, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitioner/A3 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.43/2025 of II Thottambedu Police Station, Tirupathi. S`-,. t - I a |+ 2. A case has been regI-Stered agaI®nSt the petit['oner and others for the offences punishable under sections 126(2) and 118(1) of the B.N.S. 3. case of the prosecution in brI-ef, Its that, the defacto complainant, was working at wine shop sI-tuated at Chiyyavaram vl|Ilage. On 19.4.2025 at about 10 PM, after closing the wI'ne Shop, he Proceeded tO his native village Krishnapuram in bI'ke. In the midway near Telugu Ganga canal bridge, some unjdentI'fied persons obstructed his bI.ke, and later on they chased him through theI'r bikes, and when he crossed the chjtfathur village and reached Ramalingapuram, some uniden{Ilfied persons beat him, due to whI'Ch, he sustaI'ned bleeding l'njurI-eS at left side of head, bruise at right knee, at left and right elbows. with help of neighbouring villagers, he was admitted l'n Government HospI-tat at srjkalahasti. consequently, the above sal'd crime has been regl'stered against the accused. 4. Heard leamed counsel for the petl'tioner and learned AssI-Slant pub'jc prosecutor for respondent-state. perused the record. 5. Learned Assistant public Prosecutor submits that I-nvestjgat[-on I-s going on and some more witnesses are to be examined. 6. A perusal of the ma{erl-al available on record goes to showthat7 On the date of incident i.e. on 19.4.2025 at about 10.00 pm, it is alleged that some unknown persons are alleged to have attacked the defacto ~= -i -_-S E---EQr¢ E= To] complaI'nant for Which defacto complainant sustained certain I-njuries. Learned Assistant public Prosecutor Submitted that as many as eight wI-tneSSeS are examined in the said case. But, so far, no material has been found as against the petitioner herein. ln view of the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to consider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bal-I, however, on conditions. 7. Accordingly, in the event of his arrest wI-th regard to this crime, PetI-tI-Oner/A3 shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) wI-th two Sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required and that he shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 am and 05.00 pm, till filing of the charge-sheet. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. I ITR:LJE bopy I I I_,,,' . ` . 'E SD/- K. KASIRAO ACHAR! ASS __S:SCTT:%iEF: 1. The SHO, Thottambedu Polica-`S€=tion, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District. 2. One CC to SRl. SIVAPRASAD'P`EDDY VENATI Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECI`l-j`''':roR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT] 4. One spare copy ISTRAR HIGH COURT SRK, J DATED :27/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5937 of 2025 ALLOWED