[2025:RJ-JP:23744] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8481/2025 Deepushree D/o Shri Vimal Kumar Saini W/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Saini, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Pilani, Tehsil Sura- jgarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Ser- vices, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) 4. The Block Chief Medical Officer, Surajgarh, Distt. Jhun- jhunu (Raj.) 5. The Medical Officer Incharge, Government Adarsh Primary Heath Center, Chhapda, Block Surajgarh, District Jhun- jhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 30/06/2025 Although, it is prayed in the writ petition that the order impugned dated 15.05.2025 dispensing with services of the petitioner, a pharmacist appointed on urgent temporary basis, be quashed and set aside; but, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contended if he is permitted to submit a representation with the respondents to consider his case in the [2025:RJ-JP:23744] (2 of 3) [CW-8481/2025] light of an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. [2025:RJ-JP:23744] (3 of 3) [CW-8481/2025] 2. The respondents are directed to consider the representation within a period of twelve weeks from the date of its receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra). Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/58