Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20422 (KAR)

SRI. ANIL KUMAR S v. SMT. JYOTHAMMA

MFA/1839/2025 · 2025-07-07

Ramachandra D Huddar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24377 MFA No. 1839 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1839 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: SRI ANIL KUMAR S. S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS RESIDING AT-NOSENUR VILLAGE INDALAWADI POST, JIGANI HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU-562 105. …APPELLANT (BY SRI T. ASHOKA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. JYOTHAMMA W/O. LATE MANJUNATHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 2. SRI RANJITH S/O. LATE MANJUNATHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS. 3. SRI ROHITH S/O. LATE MANJUNATHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS. RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NOSENUR VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SRI P. RAVINDRA Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24377 MFA No. 1839 of 2025 VIDE REGISTERED GPA DATED 27-03-2013 REG AS DOC NO.JGN-4-00348/12-13. 4. SRI P. RAVINDRA S/O. LATE SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.384, 1ST FLOOR 15TH CROSS ROAD, 5TH MAIN ROAD 6TH SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 034. 5. SRI MANJUNATHA REDDY V. S/O. LATE N. VENKATARAMANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NOSENUR VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS * * * THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 11-2-2025 PASSED ON I.A.NOS.1 TO 3 IN OS.NO.441 OF 2024 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, REJECTING THE IA.NO.1 TO 3 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24377 MFA No. 1839 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant intends to withdraw this appeal because of some technical difficulties. 2. His submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3