APHC010286672019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13152/2019 Between: 1. THUMMALA RAMESH,, S/O KONDALARAO AGED 40 YEARS, OCC- SOCIAL WORKER RESIDENT OF 17-2-60/16, SWAMANDRA COLONY PARALOPETA ROAD, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA-533001 ANDHRA PRADESH STATE 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PORT POLICE STATION, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 4. KUDUPUDI VEERABHADRA RAO, S/O KRISHNA AGED 35 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE RIO H.NO. 16-24-15, 1ST STREET SAMBAMURTHY NAGAR, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13152 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Station House Officer, Port Police Station, the 3rd Respondent herein in refusing to register a case against the 4th Respondent as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent, SHO, Port Police Station to forthwith register the FIR on the complaint filed by the Petitioner and approach the named accused (4th Respondent) as per law in the interest of justice, and issue such other writ or order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of case and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Vijay Mathukumilli, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 17.10.2025 Pmk 3 29 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:13152 OF 2019 Date: 17.10.2025 Pmk