BRIJESH KUMAR MISHRA S/O SHRI BHANWAR LAL MISHRA v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/8651/2025 · 2025-07-01
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20416 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20416 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23983] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8651/2025 Brijesh Kumar Mishra S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Mishra, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Bagera Tehsil Kekri District Ajmer Rajasthan At Present Working As Driver Vaishali Nagar Depot Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman And Managing Director Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan) -302 001
2. The Chief Manager, Vaishali Nagar Depot R.S.R.T.C. District Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 01/07/2025 Although, this writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to revise his salary or to amend the basic pay but,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contended if this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to file a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance and the respondents are directed to decide the same in accordance with law. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil
[2025:RJ-JP:23983] (2 of 2) [CW-8651/2025] Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:-
1. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today.
2. The respondents are directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order thereupon within a period of twelve weeks from the date of its receipt with communication of the decision to the petitioner.
3. If the petitioner feels aggrieved of the decision taken by the respondents, he would be at liberty to avail the remedy available under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/41