1 2025:CGHC:19858 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3039 of 2025 1 Vibha Dewangan D/o Late Vinod Dewangan Aged About 24 Years Occupation Assistant Grade Iii At Government Higher Secondary School Tilkeja Tahsil Korba, Block Korba District- Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Director Lok Shikshan Directerate, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 District Education Officer Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent(s) / State : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 01/05/2025 Heard. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.05.02 11:01:51 +0530 2 1. By the present, writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the show cause notice dated 16.04.205 by which the petitioner has been directed by the District Education Officer to explain about allegation made against the petitioner that at the time of appointment on compassionate ground on death of her father, she has not disclosed the fact that the mother of the petitioner is also in government job. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that the petitioner has submitted a reply to the show cause notice stating that at the time of death of her father the petitioner was residing with his father and was fully dependent on the income of his father and the petitioner has also disclosed the fact about the employment of her mother in the application for compassionate ground (Annexure P-2). 3. Learned State counsel submits that the writ petition against the show cause notice is not maintainable and the petitioner has already submitted the explanation/ reply to the show cause notice. The same will be considered in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents and pleadings of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submission made by the parties, as the petitioner has already submitted the reply/ explanation to the show cause notice, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner to the show cause notice in accordance with law before proceeding further in the matter. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti