Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20415 (AP)

Smt S. Rani v. State of A.P.,

WP/13192/2019 · 2025-09-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010285842019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13192/2019 Between: 1. SMT S. RANI, W/O. LATE SARANGAPANI, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O. 11-42, UPPRAPALLI, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEURBAN, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R.PALLI P.S.., M.R.PALLI,CHITTOOR DIST., 4. THIRUMALA PRAKASH REDDY, S / O. NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED 51 YEARS,OCC- LAND GRABBING, R/O. TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. YEDDULA LAKSHMI REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED 46 YEARS, OCC- LAND GRABBING, R/O. 2, TIRUMALA NAGAR, UPPARAPALLI, THU MMALAGUNTA POST, TIRUPATI RURAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13192 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not registering a Crime pursuant to complaint dated 19.08.2019 of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to register a Crime pursuant to complaint dated 19.08.2019 of the petitioner forthwith and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Srinivasulu Kurra, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.09.2025 Pmk 4 31 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:13192 OF 2019 Date: 04.09.2025 Pmk