Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20414 (RAJ)

AKASH SINGH S/O SHRI RAMPRAKASH @ PAPPU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3235/2025 · 2025-07-03

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24402] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3235/2025 1. Akash Singh S/o Shri Ramprakash @ Pappu, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bareh Mori, Tehsil And District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 2. Ramprakash @ Pappu S/o Late Shri Baijnath, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Bareh Mori, Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 03/07/2025 1. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that FIR has been lodged on account of recovery of illegal liquor from the disputed premises, which is owned by petitioner No. 2, who in turn executed one authority in the form of consent memo in favour of petitioner No. 1 to let out the premises. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that pursuant to such authority, the petitioner No. 1 let out the premises to one Shri Satendra Son of Virendra and rent note has also been placed on record as Annex.-3. Learned counsel further submits that in view of above, in case any misdeed or offences [2025:RJ-JP:24402] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3235/2025] have been committed in the disputed premises, then the petitioners were not liable. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the criminal misc. petition. 4. In view of above, the petitioners are directed to make a representation before the Investigating Officer along with the documents enclosed in the instant criminal misc. petition. 5. The Investigating Officer, after making necessary investigation with regard to such representation and documents, would take appropriate legal action within a period of one month thereafter. 6. Accordingly, the criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /67