Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2041 (UTT)

PANCHANAND v. NEELAM

FA/18/2020 · 2025-07-30

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6643-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS FA/18/2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate for the appellant. 2. No representation for the respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal has become infructuous as both the parties have remarried after passing of divorce decree by the learned Family Court, Udham Singh Nagar. He submits that, in view of this development, the appellant is also not interested in pursuing this appeal. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 30.07.2025 30.07.2025 Rajni 2025:UHC:6643-DB