Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20404 (PNJ)

ARUN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/6221/2025 · 2025-04-02

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 CRM-M-6221-2025 Date of decision : 02.04.2025 Arun ….Petitioner V/S State of Haryana ….Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Sadar, A.A.G., Haryana. **** NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.237 dated 13.07.2024 registered under Sections 137, 3(5) & 87 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (final report has been presented under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 64(2)(m) & 87 of BNS, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012) at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in pursuance to the order dated 03.02.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has joined the investigation. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Shakuntala, has not disputed the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further investigation. Vinod Kothiyal 2025.04.02 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-6221-2025 -2- 4. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 03.02.2025 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C./482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 02.04.2025 (NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No Vinod Kothiyal 2025.04.02 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document