Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20402 (JHR)

SUNIL MAHTO ALIAS SUNIL KUMAR MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6905/2025 · 2025-08-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:22555 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6905 of 2025 --------- Sunil Mahto @ Sunil Kumar Mahto, aged about 27 years, son of Budhu Mahto, resident of Village-Budhakhap near Hanuman Mandir, P.O. Mandu, P.S. Mandu (Kujju), District Ramghar. .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. --------- 02/08.08.2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 302/201 of Indian Penal Code, in connection with Mandu (Kujju) P.S. Case No.88 of 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits from perusal of FIR it would be evident that there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner and there is only general and omnibus allegations have been made by the information in the written report. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and nothing incriminating has been recovered or seized from the conscious possession of this petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused namely Surendra Mahto has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 09.04.2024 in B.A. No. 263 of 2024. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 13.06.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to 2025:JHHC:22555 2 the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh in connection with Mandu (Kujju) P.S. Case No.88 of 2023. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-