- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:26869 RFA No. 99 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.99 OF 2015 (DEC/POS) BETWEEN: SMT CHANDRAMMA W/O LATE SRI J BORANNA 46 YEARS, R/AT SITE NO.129 K K LAYOUT, MALLATHAHALLI BANGALORE-560072. …APPELLANT (BY SRI H DEVENDRAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT PREMALATHA W/O CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT C/O SRI V S RAIKAR NO.19/A, 7TH MAIN ROAD CHBS LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE REPTD. BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI SURESH KUMAR 2. SRI M G NAGESHA ACHARYA S/O SRI M GUNDA ACHARYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO. 96, 7TH MAIN SHIVNAGARA, 2ND BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD BANGALORE-560010 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY K, ADVOCATE FOR CAVEATOR R1 TO R2; SRI JAGADEESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2023:KHC:26869 RFA No. 99 of 2015 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2014 PASSED IN O.S.No.4431/2004 ON THE FILE OF XIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Case called twice. None present on behalf of the appellant. Even on previous occasion, there was no representation. Peremptory order was passed on 04.03.2020, which reads as under: “None appears for the appellants. If paper book is not filed within four weeks from today, appeals shall stand dismissed.” 2. Till today, paper book is not filed. Therefore, office has listed the matter for dismissal. Even after calling the case twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. - 3 - NC: 2023:KHC:26869 RFA No. 99 of 2015 3. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9