RAM KEWAL TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 12 OTHERS
WRIC/10039/2025 · 2025-10-28
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203880 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203880 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10039 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Amendment application filed today is taken on record. (Order on Amendment Application)
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
3. I have perused the affidavit accompanying the amendment application and find that sufficient cause has been made out for allowing the same. Accordingly, amendment application is allowed.
4. Let necessary corrections be carried out during the course of the day. (Order on Writ Petition)
5. The restoration application filed by the petitioner, which is pending before the respondent No.4/ Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh, be decided at the earliest, preferably within a period of two weeks from date.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 28, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ram Kewal Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench