APHC010285912018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12905/2018 Between: D.SYAM SUNDAR REDDY, S/O. D.SHANKER REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, R/ O. D.NO.8-301-37, LAXMI NAGAR COLONY, SHAIKPET, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SCHOOL EDUCATION (TRG) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE A P EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL ROAD, D.NO.5-6-59/ 6/ 1, CHITTI NAGAR, LAMBADIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. K JANARDHAN REDDY, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER/ EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (I / C), A.P. EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, KADAPA DIVISION, KADAPA. 4. N NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, PRESENTLY CHIEF ENGINEER INCHARGE, AP EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SEENA KUMAR (SC FOR APEWIDC AND RVM SSA 2. K S V SUBBA RAO 3. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (TG) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent issued Letter No.762155/TRG /A1 / 2017 dated 21.11.2017 and the consequential proceedings of the 2nd respondent issued in RC.E1/1422/ 2016 dated 22.11.2017 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment for the post of Chief Engineer Incharge in the 2nd respondent corporation.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G.Seena Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for APEWIDC & RVM SSA would submit that the Petitioner as well as Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are retired from services and no further orders are required in this matter. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12905 of 2018 Dt.05.03.2025 Dinesh