Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203879 (ALL)

ROHIT @ ROHIT SINGH @ MOTU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/10694/2025 · 2025-11-12

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10694 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.265 of 2025, under Sections 70(2), 351(3) of BNS; Section 5(G)(L)/6 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Mitauli, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 4. In terms of the FIR lodged on 31.08.2025, it was alleged that around 8 months ago, the daughter of the informant had gone out of her home when the applicant enticed her and took her and thereafter wrong was committed by various persons. 5. The Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant and the victim had married and the photographs to that effect is on record. 6. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 7. Considering the substantial delay in lodging the FIR and the supplementary affidavit filed today annexing the photographs of marriage and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : J.B. Singh, Vineet Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit @ Rohit Singh @ Motu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) languishing in jail since 31.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed . 8. Let the applicant Rohit @ Rohit Singh @ Motu be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 12, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10694 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench