SUBHADRA DEVI @ CHADANI v. DR. VIBHARANI GUJARATI AND 8 OTHERS
A227/6551/2025 · 2025-11-12
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203876 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203876 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6551 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Sri Ravindra Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to certain defects that have crept in the petition he does not want to press the petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid. Let the certified copies of orders be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies on record. November 12, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Subhadra Devi @ Chadani .....Petitioner(s) Dr. Vibharani Gujarati And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench