Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20386 (AP)

Sanapala Vykuntamma v. Sanapala Krishna Rao,

AS/941/2017 · 2025-02-06

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010286382017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No: 941/2017 Between: 1. SANAPALA VYKUNTAMMA, W/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RIO KRISHNAPURAM, 2ND WARD, AMADALAVALASA TOWN & MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SANAPALA KRISHNA RAO, S/o Gopala Rao, Hindu, aged about 58 years, Occ: Teacher, R/o D, No: 1/209 Cheemalavalasa Village Amadalavalasa Mandalam, Srikakulam District. ...RESPONDENT THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT: The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.08.2017, passed in O.S.No.51 of 2014, on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, at Srikakulam. 2. None appeared for appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 3. On 10.12.2024, on representation made by learned counsel for the appellant, this Court ordered to issue notice to the appellant. 4. Today, when the matter is taken up, it is brought to the notice of this Court that notice has been served on the appellant. Despite service of notice, the appellant did not choose to turn up. It seems that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the matter and this Court has no other alternative except to dismiss the appeal. 5. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 06.02.2025 M K K