Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203846 (ALL)

SITA DEVI THRU. POWER OF ATTORNEY HER SON VINAY v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SADAR II, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

A227/6353/2025 · 2025-10-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6353 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for a direction to the State-respondent to decide old case no. 1037/2003-04 subsequently changed as Case NO. 1440 CO-II and new case no. 636/4001 C.O.II, Computerized Case No. 2011550257040001 (Lakkhi Devi @ Purka and another Vs. Ram Samujh and others), U/S 9A(2) of C.H. Act expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Consolidation Officer Sadar-II, Pratapgarh is directed to decide old case no. 1037/2003-04 subsequently changed as Case NO. 1440 CO-II and new case no. 636/4001 C.O.II, Computerized Case No. 2011550257040001 (Lakkhi Devi @ Purka and another Vs. Ram Samujh and others), U/S 9A(2) of C.H. Act, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sita Devi Thru. Power Of Attorney Her Son Vinay .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Sadar Ii, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 Ravi/Anurag A227 No. 6353 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench