RAMA SHANKAR NISAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/13069/2025 · 2025-11-12
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203845 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203845 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13069 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:-
"(i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing and commanding the Opposite Party Number 2, to forthwith grant the arrears of the salary to the petitioner on Class IV Post, w.e.f. March 2018 till 16.07.2024, in view of the judgment dated 17.11.2018, rendered by the Hon'ble High Court at Allahabad in Writ A Number 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and Another v State of U.P. and Others). 3. Ms. Parul Bajpai, learned State Counsel submits that earlier as well, petitioner had filed WRIT - A No. - 1088 of 2024 seeking the same relief and the petition was disposed of vide order dated 15.02.2024 issuing a direction to authority concerned for a decision on petitioner's representation whereafter order dated 16.07.2024 has been passed granting minimum of pay-scale to petitioner. 4. In response thereto, learned counsel for petitioner submits that despite a direction being issued by this Court in earlier writ petition with regard to consideration for grant of arrears of salary as well, the same is still Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rama Shankar Nisad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
pending consideration without any final orders having been issued. 5. Learned State Counsel does not have any instructions as to whether any orders were passed with regard to arrears of salary of petitioner. 6. In view thereof, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. The Deputy Director, Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, Pallia Kala, Lakhimpur Kheri. In case such a representation is filed, the said authority shall consider and decide such grievance of petitioner expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order in case no final orders have been passed earlier by authorities with regard to said grievance and in pursuance of earlier order of this Court dated 15.02.2024. 7. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of.
November 12, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 13069 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench