IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 3018 of 2017 ------ 1.Yogendra Ram, S/o late Gulab Chand Ram, R/o Opposite Block Office, Garhwa, P.O.&PS-Garhwa, District-Garhwa permanent r/o village & Post-Basna, P.S. Bishrampur, District-Palamu 2. Pratima Kumari @ Pratima Devi, W/o Yogendra Ram, R/o Opposite Block Office, Garhwa, P.O&PS-Garhwa, District-Garhwa permanent r/o village & Post-Basna, P.s. Bishrampur, District- Palamu …… Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Lalita Kuwanr, W/o late Rajnath Ram, R/o Village-Bansdih Kalan, P.O &P.S-Bhawnathpur, District- Garhwa, at present r/o Quarter No. B-5 Bock Colony, Garhwa, P.O&PS-Garhwa, District- Garhwa. .... .... ....Opposite Parties Cr.M.P. No. 3006 of 2017 ------ 1.Nagendra Ram, S/o Late Gulab Chand ram, R/o Village & Post- Basna, P.S. Bishrampur, District-Palamu …… Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Lalita Kuwanr, W/o late Rajnath Ram, R/o Village-Bansdih Kalan, P.O &P.S-Bhawnathpur, District- Garhwa, at present r/o Quarter No. B-5 Bock Colony, Garhwa, P.O&PS-Garhwa, District- Garhwa. .... .... ....Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishi Pallava, Advocate For the State/OP : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, A.P.P. : Mr. Achinto Sen, Spl.PP. ------ Order No.05/Dated: 06.01.2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition has become infructuous due to final decision in the original proceeding. 3. The learned APPs’ have raised no objection. 4. Therefore, both the above petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Abha/ (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)