Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20384 (AP)

Alamanda Devi, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/18894/2020 · 2025-08-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010286022020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18894/2020 Between: 1. ALAMANDA DEVI,, W/O CHANDRA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-38, MUNAGALA VILLAGE, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. ALAMANDASATYANARAYANA,, S/O LATEVENKATA KRISHNA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-105, MUNAGALA VILLAGE, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. ALAMANDA CHANDRA RAO,, S/O LATE.VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-38, MUNAGALA VILLAGE, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. ALAMANDA SEETAMMA, W/O LATE.VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-38C, MUNAGALA VILLAGE, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. ALAMANDA TATA RAO,, S/O LATE.VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-104, MUNAGALA VILLAGE KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, 2 GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM URBAN, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , NORTH ZONE,KORUKONDA, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KORUKONDA POLICE STATION, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KORUKONDA POLICE STATION, KORUKONDA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, that directing the respondents 6 and 7 not to interfere in to the civil litigations between the tenants and landlord till disposal of the ATC 2/2020, ATC 3/2020, ATC 4/2020, ATC 5/2020, ATC 6/2020 and landlord suit O.S.No.343/2020 which are pending before Honourable Principle Junior Civil Judge cum Special Officer for Tenancy Tribunal, Rajamahendravaram, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 6 and 7 not to interfere with the civil litigations of the petitioners and their landlords pertains to Ac.15-60 cents in RS.Nos.177 and 190 of Munagala Village, Korukonda Mandal, East Godavari District till disposal of the ATC 2/2020, ATC 3/2020, ATC 4/2020, ATC 5/2020, ATC 6/2020 & O.S.No.343/2020, including dispossession from the property in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. R K ACHARYULU 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 4 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, that directing the respondents 6 and 7 not to interfere in to the civil litigations between the tenants and landlord till disposal of the ATC 2/2020, ATC 3/2020, ATC 4/2020, ATC 5/2020, ATC 6/2020 and landlord suit O.S.No.343/2020 which are pending before Honourable Principle Junior Civil Judge cum Special Officer for Tenancy Tribunal, Rajamahendravaram, and pass...…” 2. Heard Sri R.K.Acharyulu, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.08.2025 MH 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 36 W.P.No.18894 of 2020 Dated.19.08.2025 MH