Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203836 (ALL)

JASVANT AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/3402/2025 · 2025-10-28

Manjive Shukla

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3402 of 2025 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Shri Krishna Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State. 2. The captioned criminal appeal has been filed challenging therein, the summoning order dated 08.08.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bahraich in Case No.1002 of 2022, F.I.R. No.295 of 2022, whereby the appellant had been summoned to face trial for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(Da) & 3(1)(Dha), SC/ST Act, Police Station-Bisheshwarganj, District-Bahraich. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants, at the very outset, has submitted that the appellants shall surrender before the trial court and shall file the application for grant of bail. He has further submitted that this Court may direct the trial court to consider and decide the appellants' application for bail in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State does not have any objection if the aforesaid limited prayer is allowed in favour of the appellants. 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this criminal appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellants to surrender before the trial court concerned and file the application for bail within a period of four weeks from today and if such application is filed, the trial court is hereby directed to consider and decide the said application, expeditiously keeping in view the law laid down Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Krishna Kumar Verma, Prinsi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Jasvant And Another .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). It is further provided that for the period of four weeks, no coercive measures shall be taken against the appellants. October 28, 2025 akhilesh/- CRLA No. 3402 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench