HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 23618 of 2018 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. After hearing the matter at length, what comes out is that long back there was some encroachment near the gate of SGPGI and there was also some obstruction of traffic, etc. on account of encroachments, but as of now, there is no encroachment and another gate has also been opened for accessing SGPGI. As regards the alleged encroachment by some shopkeepers, some proceedings have taken place and according to petitioner appearing in person even after dismissal of revision, the demolition orders have not been carried out. However, Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for LDA states that by the revisional order the matter was remanded and the matter is fixed before the prescribed authority on 18.11.2025. 3. We direct the prescribed authority to decide the matter at the earliest, keeping in mind the revisional or appellate orders and the law on the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : P.S.Pandey In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Abhinav Singh, Amit Kumar Dwivedi, Arjun Gupta, Ashok Kumar Shukla, Jyotsana Singh, Ratnesh Chandra, Samidha, Shaliendra Singh Chauhan, Sunil Kumar Mishra Prem Shanker Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Planning And Development And Ors .....Respondent(s) subject, say within two months. This is without prejudice to the rights, if any, of the private opposite parties to seek such other remedy, as may be permissible under law. 4. At this stage it is informed by Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing for some of the private opposite parties that an application for correction of map was filed under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pertaining to the land over which the shops of his clients are built, which was rejected, against which an appeal bearing no.5280 of 2025 has been filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow, which is pending. Subject to maintainability of the said appeal, let the appellate authority decide the appeal no. 5280 of 2025, at the earliest say within two months. 5. Shri V.P. Nag, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel shall communicate this order to the appellate authority. Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for LDA shall do the same to the prescribed authority. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 12, 2025 Arnima WPIL No. 23618 of 2018 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench