IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No.8545 of 2022 Date of Decision: 25.08.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Shri Pankaj Parmar ……...Petitioner Versus HPSEBL and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment dated 23.06.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.8032 of 2021, titled as Vikas Kumar Vs. Sate of H.P. and Others, along with connected matters. 2. Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause, vis-à-vis judgment passed by this Court in Vikas Kumar case (supra), this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case decided by this Court. Vide aforesaid judgment, this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, respondents can be directed to decide the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment rendered by this Court. 2 3. Consequently, in view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by this Court in Vikas Kumar case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes. In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any. August 25, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), Rajeev Raturi Judge