APHC010286132020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18908/2020 Between: 1. VALLURII MANGA, W/O SALIMTALI AGED 55 YEARS. AGRICULTURE LABOUR R/O L.N. PURAM, PITHAPURAM MANDAL, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, O/O DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRIC 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PITHAPURAM URBAN PS PITHAPURAM MANDAL, KAKINADA, EG DISTRICT 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PITHAPURAM RURAL PS PITHAPURAM MANDAL, KAKINADA, EG DISTRICT 7. JONNADA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O SURYA RAO AGED 55 YEARS, EXTENSION OFFICER, PR AND RD DEPARTMENT, PITHAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction, more in the nature of writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, declaring action of 5th and 6th respondent for not registering FIR for cognizable offences u/s3 (1) (e) (x) (xi) (r) and W (Oi) under The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against party respondents and offences under IPC provisions in pursuance of the complaint filed by the petitioner is concerned, contrary to law reported in AIR 2014 SC 187 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malafide and unconstitutional violating 2 Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India, and issue consequential directions, directing 2nd and 3rd respondents to instruct the 5th or the 6th respondent to conduct enquiry and register FIR against party respondents for offences u/s 3 (1) (e) (x) (x) (r) and W (i/ii) under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and provisions of 1PC in pursuance of complaint filed by petitioner is concerned, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 18908 2020 11.09.2025 Mjl /*