PRAMOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CO OPERATIVE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIA/12289/2025 · 2025-10-16
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203798 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 203798 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12289 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Arun Pratap Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"[I] Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of in nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to regularised the services on the post of Salesman upon which they are working as contractual basis and also direct to provide the minimum pay scale & other benefit as applicable to him. [II] Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of in nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide the minimum pay scale & other benefit as applicable to him. [III] Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of in nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to decide the representation of the petitioner which is pending before the opposite parties no 6. [IV] Issue such other order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem, fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner. [V] Allow the writ petition with cost." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 6 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 03.10.2025 within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pramod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Co Operative Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the respondent no.6/Chairman, Central Consumer, Co-Operative Ltd, Pratapgarh, is hereby
directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 03.10.2025, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of.
October 16, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 12289 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench