Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203791 (ALL)

Farhan Ahmad v. state of u.p.thru prin.secy. revenue lko and ors.

WRIC/120/2022 · 2025-10-28

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 120 of 2022 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. The present writ petition has been appearing under the heading of "Priority Cases". 2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner(s) even in the revised call. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondent(s) and learned counsel for the respondent are present. 4. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that no cause of action survives, and accordingly, the matter is consigned to record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. 6. In the event, the petitioner(s) is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner(s) to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. October 28, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhup Chandra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ashok Kumar, Piyush Mishra, Umesh Singh, Vidya Bhushan Pandey (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Farhan Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy. Revenue Lko And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench