Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20378 (JHR)

ANAND SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4804/2024 · 2025-03-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4804 of 2024 ------ 1. Anand Singh, aged about 51 years, s/o late Mani Singh 2. Deepak Rawani, aged about 45 years, s/o late Gaya Rawani Both r/o Dumra, P.O. & P.S.-Baghmara, Dist.-Dhanbad … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Meera Devi, w/o Mukul Rawani, r/o Vill-Dumra, P.O.- Nawagarh, P.S.-Baghmara, Dist.-Dhanbad … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate ------ Order No.06 Dated- 06.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with C.P. Case No. 8860 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under sections 420/467/468/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners purchased a land which was sold by the father of the vendor of the petitioners to the complainant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the dispute between the parties is at best a civil dispute. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the complainant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dhanbad, in connection with C.P. Case No. 8860 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the trial of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the complainant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-