Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20378 (AP)

R. Srinivasa Rao v. The Managing Director

WP/7272/1999 · 2025-07-02

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010286111999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 7272/1999 Between: 1. R. SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY PRODUCTION MANAGER TRAINING CUM PRODUCTION CENTER, A.P.V.C.C. VIJAYAWADA, R/O. VIJAYAWADA ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.VIKALANGULA CO-OPERATIVE CORPORATION, BRKR BHAVAN, HYDERABAD 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, EXECUTIVE OFFICER EX-OFFICER A.P.V.C.C. MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. DR C SRIDHAR, S/O. MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. VIKALANGULA CO-OPERATIVE CORPORATION BRKR BHAVAN ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in thye nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned order in Proceedings E/C-36/99/D, dt. 29.3.1999 as illegal, arbitrary, and set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 1999(WVMP 1349 OF 1999 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased - IA NO: 2 OF 1999(WPMP 9025 OF 1999 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order in proceedings No. E/C-36/99/D, dtated 29.3.1999 issued by the first respondent, pending the disposal of the W.P in this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D.GAYATHRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G CHAKRAVARTHY The Court made the following order: Sri T.D.Phani Kumar, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and has become infructuous. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS