Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 203776 (ALL)

SMT. MANJU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/10095/2025 · 2025-10-28

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10095 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel and Sri Pramod Kumar Verma, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of informant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The Counsel for the opposite party states that an appeal lies under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the order dated 20.11.2024 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Lucknow. 3. In view of above, the Counsel for the applicant states that he wants to withdraw the bail application with liberty to prefer an appeal under Section 14-A (2) of SC/ST Act. 4. The present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the abovesaid liberty. 5. Certified copies of the FIR and the bail rejection order shall be returned to the Counsel for the applicant on moving appropriate application. October 28, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Piyush Pathak, Himadri Goswami, Kapil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Smt. Manju Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench